Employment disputes Kenya ELRC, the Employment and Labour Relations Court has exclusive jurisdiction over workplace conflicts, established under the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, No. 20 of 2011. The ELRC has exclusive original and appellate jurisdiction over disputes arising from employment relationships, trade union disputes, and collective bargaining agreements, and has the status of the High Court. Several procedural points around how a dispute actually gets to the ELRC, and what happens once it is there, are more nuanced than a quick summary tends to suggest, and getting them right at the outset shapes how the whole matter is run.

Employment Disputes Kenya ELRC: Steps to Filing a Labour Court Claim

The Labour Relations Act sets out a structured conciliation mechanism for “trade disputes”, a term defined broadly enough to include disputes over dismissal, suspension, or redundancy, not only collective bargaining disagreements between an employer and a trade union. A trade dispute can be reported to the Cabinet Secretary under Section 62, who appoints a conciliator or conciliation committee, and under Section 69 the dispute is deemed unresolved after conciliation once the conciliator issues a certificate to that effect, or once thirty days have passed from the conciliator’s appointment without resolution, whichever comes first. This mechanism is genuinely available and commonly used for dismissal-related disputes, not just for collective trade union matters. Where the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act’s own position is more nuanced than “strictly enforced precondition” suggests is in Section 15: the Court may adopt or refer a matter to conciliation, mediation, or other ADR mechanisms on its own motion or at a party’s request, and where it becomes apparent during proceedings that a dispute ought to have been referred for conciliation, the Court may stay the proceedings and refer it, a discretionary power rather than an automatic bar to having filed the claim in the first place. Two subsections of this provision dealing with a stricter precondition were in fact deleted by the Statute Law (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act, 2014, which is consistent with the current framework being less rigid on this point than it once was. In practice, claimants are well advised to attempt Labour Officer conciliation and obtain a certificate of unresolved dispute before filing where the matter qualifies as a trade dispute under the Labour Relations Act, since it remains standard practice and avoids giving the Court a discretionary basis to stay the matter, but it is more accurate to describe this as strong practical advisability than as an absolute jurisdictional precondition in every case. A claimant facing an urgent situation, an imminent unlawful termination or a contractual deadline, should get advice on whether waiting for the conciliation process to run its full course is actually necessary on the specific facts, rather than assuming it always is.

Unfair Dismissal: Substantive and Procedural Fairness

Termination of employment must be for a valid reason and follow a fair procedure; both elements are independently assessed, and a dismissal can fail on either ground regardless of the strength of the other. Valid reasons include misconduct, poor performance, redundancy, and incompatibility. The minimum procedural requirement is that the employee must be notified of the allegations against them, given a reasonable opportunity to respond, and told the outcome of the process. Kenyan courts consistently set aside dismissals that were substantively justified, where the employer genuinely had good reason to dismiss, but procedurally defective, where that minimum process was not actually followed; substantive justification is not a defence to a procedural failure. Employers who fail to meet these minimum procedural requirements expose themselves to compensation of up to twelve months’ wages under Section 49 of the Employment Act, calculated on the employee’s gross monthly wage at the time of dismissal and subject to ordinary statutory deductions, in addition to terminal benefits and outstanding leave pay that remain owed regardless of how the dismissal itself is characterised. An employer that has a genuinely strong substantive case for dismissal should treat that as no substitute for following the notification-and-hearing process properly, since the two are assessed entirely separately by the Court.

Redundancy: The Procedural Requirements

Redundancy is a valid reason for termination, but Section 40 of the Employment Act imposes strict procedural conditions that must all be satisfied. Where the affected employee belongs to a trade union, the employer must notify both the union and the labour officer for the area of the reasons for and extent of the intended redundancy at least one month before the intended termination date; where the employee does not belong to a union, the employer must notify the employee personally in writing and notify the labour officer. The employer must also have given due regard to seniority in time, and to the skill, ability, and reliability of each employee within the affected class, in selecting who is to be made redundant, and must pay severance pay of not less than fifteen days’ pay for each completed year of service. This severance pay requirement does not apply where the termination arises from the employer’s insolvency, which is instead governed by the Act’s separate provisions on termination due to insolvency. Failure to comply with any of these conditions, not just the headline notice period, makes the redundancy unfair, and a redundancy carried out with proper notice but a selection process that ignored seniority and skill criteria is just as exposed as one carried out with no notice at all.

Time Limits

Claims under the Employment Act must generally be filed within three years of the cause of action arising, and delays in filing, even where the claim is still technically within the limitation period, can prejudice it in practice, since witness recollection fades and documentary records become harder to locate the longer a claim sits unfiled. A claimant who waits close to the limitation deadline before filing should expect the delay itself to be raised, even if unsuccessfully, as part of the employer’s defence.

Remedies

The ELRC can award reinstatement with back pay, compensation in lieu of reinstatement, damages for breach of contract, payment of outstanding wages and benefits, and compensation for injury to dignity. Punitive damages are available in cases of egregious employer conduct, though they are reserved for conduct that goes beyond an ordinary unfair dismissal to something more deliberately oppressive. A claimant’s prayer for relief should be tailored to which of these remedies actually fits the facts, since reinstatement is rarely appropriate where the employment relationship has broken down irretrievably, and the Court is more likely to award compensation in lieu in those circumstances regardless of what the claimant initially sought.

Clay & Associates Advocates advises employers and employees on ELRC litigation, conciliation strategy under the Labour Relations Act, unfair dismissal and redundancy compliance, and remedies assessment. If you are facing an employment dispute, whether as the employer managing a redundancy or dismissal, or as an employee whose termination did not follow the required process, we can help you assess your position and the correct procedural route before filing.

Facing an employment dispute? Contact Clay & Associates Advocates for advice on your position. Book a Consultation

Related reading: Insurance Law and Regulation in Kenya

For tailored legal advice on this matter, speak with our litigation and dispute resolution practice team at Clay & Associates Advocates. We advise businesses and individuals across Kenya on Litigation and Dispute Resolution matters from our offices at Nextgen Mall, Nairobi.