Incorporating a company at the Business Registration Service is a procedural step. Agreeing on how the company will actually be run, how decisions will be made, and what happens when shareholders fall out is the harder and more consequential task. A shareholders’ agreement is the document that does this work.
Many businesses operate without one, relying on the Companies Act No. 17 of 2015 and the company’s articles of association. This works until it doesn’t, and when it fails, it fails expensively.
What a Shareholders Agreement Does That Articles Cannot
The articles of association are a public document filed at the BRS and accessible to anyone. A shareholders’ agreement is private, binding only on its signatories. It can contain commercially sensitive provisions, including valuation mechanisms, non-compete obligations, and financial information rights, that you would not want publicly disclosed.
The articles are also one-size-fits-all documents. The BRS Model Articles address standard governance requirements under the Companies Act. They say nothing about what happens when two equal shareholders deadlock on a strategic decision, when a founder holding 40 percent leaves to join a competitor, or how an investor can exit if the company misses performance targets.
Core Clauses in a Kenyan Shareholders Agreement
Pre-emption rights give existing shareholders the right of first refusal when another shareholder wants to sell. Without this clause, a founder could sell their shares to a stranger or a competitor. Most shareholders’ agreements require the selling shareholder to first offer the shares to the other shareholders pro rata at the same price and on the same terms they have negotiated with the proposed buyer.
Drag-along provisions allow majority shareholders to require minority shareholders to sell their shares in a trade sale, preventing a minority holder from blocking an otherwise agreed exit. Tag-along provisions give minority shareholders the right to participate in a sale by majority shareholders on the same terms, preventing them from being left behind in a partial exit.
Deadlock provisions address the scenario where shareholders cannot agree on a decision requiring their approval. Common mechanisms include a shoot-out clause (each party submits a bid; the highest bidder buys out the other at that price), escalation procedures, and reserved matters requiring unanimous consent.
Vesting schedules are increasingly common in Kenyan companies with multiple founders. A typical schedule gives a founder full ownership of their shares over three or four years, with a one-year cliff. If the founder leaves before the cliff, they receive nothing. This protects remaining founders from carrying a large inactive shareholder.
Non-compete and non-solicitation obligations must be reasonable in scope, duration, and geographic area to be enforceable. A two-year non-compete covering the specific market the company operates in, within Nairobi and its metropolitan area, is more likely to be upheld than a global, permanent restriction.
What a Shareholders Agreement Cannot Do
A shareholders’ agreement cannot override the mandatory provisions of the Companies Act. Shareholders cannot contract out of the statutory duties imposed on directors, the requirements for shareholder approval of certain transactions, or the rights of minority shareholders to bring derivative actions under Part VI of the Act.
When to Put One in Place
The time to negotiate a shareholders’ agreement is before the company is operating, before investment is received, and before the relationship has been tested. Negotiating during a commercial dispute is expensive, adversarial, and often unsuccessful.
Need a shareholders’ agreement? Contact Clay & Associates Advocates for a consultation. Book a Consultation
