Media and Broadcasting Law in Kenya: The CA Framework

Media law Kenya Communications Authority, the CA is one of three separate regulatory bodies governing broadcasting, print, and telecommunications, not a single all-encompassing regulator. Three separate bodies handle three separate functions: the CA licenses broadcast spectrum and broadcasting operations under the Kenya Information and Communications Act (KICA), the Media Council of Kenya handles journalist accreditation and editorial standards for print and online media under a different statute, and the Kenya Film Classification Board classifies film and audiovisual content under yet another. Knowing which regulator actually governs the activity in front of you is the first compliance question, not an afterthought, and a business that assumes one regulator’s clearance covers all three risks discovering the gap only once a different regulator raises it.

Media Law Kenya Communications Authority: The Three-Regulator Framework

The CA is established under Section 3 of KICA and licenses broadcasters, telecommunications operators, and postal service providers. Under the Act, a person is not eligible for a broadcasting licence if they are a political party, an adjudged bankrupt, a person of unsound mind, or a public or state officer, among other prescribed disqualifications. In deciding whether to grant a licence, the Authority must have regard to public interest obligations, diversity and plurality of views in the marketplace of ideas, the availability of frequency spectrum including for future use, efficiency and economy in service provision, demand for the proposed service in the relevant area, and the expected technical quality of the proposed broadcast. Separate licence categories apply to free-to-air television, subscription television, commercial radio, community radio, and campus radio, and a broadcasting licence does not by itself confer frequency spectrum rights; spectrum is allocated through a separate process from the Authority, which matters for an applicant budgeting and timelining a launch, since clearing the licence stage does not mean spectrum is automatically available or assigned on the same timeline.

Foreign Ownership and Local Content: What Is Actually in the Act

A frequently repeated claim is that KICA fixes a specific foreign shareholding cap for broadcasting licensees and a specific local content quota. Reading the Act itself, neither figure is actually written into the primary legislation. What the Act does is define “local content” by reference to classification requirements the Authority may set “from time to time”, and leave matters like shareholding disclosure and ownership conditions to the licence terms and subsidiary regulations the Authority issues rather than to a fixed statutory percentage. The practical consequence is that a foreign investor or local content producer should check the Authority’s current licensing guidelines and the specific conditions attached to the licence category in question rather than rely on a remembered percentage from an old article or, for that matter, from an earlier version of this one. The number that mattered five years ago is not necessarily the number that applies today, and the Authority has the power to revise these conditions without a fresh Act of Parliament, which is exactly the kind of detail that should be confirmed directly with the Authority at the time of application rather than assumed from precedent.

Content Standards: The Programming Code

Broadcast content standards are set out in the Programming Code issued by the Authority under its regulation-making powers rather than written directly into KICA itself. The Code establishes minimum standards for content scheduling, prohibits harmful programming, and enforces a watershed period restricting adult content before a set evening hour. Because the Code is a regulatory instrument rather than primary legislation, it can be revised by the Authority more readily than the Act, which is another reason a broadcaster’s compliance team should be checking the current version directly rather than working from a summary. Film and audiovisual content classification, separately, sits with the Kenya Film Classification Board under the Films and Stage Plays Act, which is the body that actually rates a film or determines age restrictions; a broadcaster carrying classified content needs to satisfy both the Authority’s Programming Code and the classification attached by the Board, and the two requirements are not interchangeable, so a broadcaster cannot treat a Board classification as a substitute for its own Programming Code compliance review before airing the content.

Print and Online Media: The Media Council

The Media Council Act, 2013 established the Media Council of Kenya, which accredits journalists and handles complaints about media content through its own complaints mechanism. This is a meaningfully different regulatory model from the CA’s licensing approach: the Council operates closer to a self-regulatory and standards body for journalism and editorial conduct, while the CA exercises a state licensing function over broadcast infrastructure and spectrum. A print or online publication with no broadcast component falls under the Media Council’s accreditation and standards framework rather than under CA licensing at all, which is a distinction that matters for a digital-only newsroom deciding which regulator’s rules actually apply to it, and matters again for a hybrid outlet that publishes online but also wants to launch a radio or television arm, since that second activity brings CA licensing into play for the first time.

Online Speech: The Computer Misuse and Cybercrimes Act

The Computer Misuse and Cybercrimes Act, 2018 previously added a separate layer of exposure for anyone publishing content online, but that exposure has since narrowed materially. Section 22 had criminalised intentionally publishing false, misleading, or fictitious data with intent that it be acted upon as authentic, and Section 23 had criminalised knowingly publishing false information calculated to or resulting in panic, chaos, or violence, or likely to discredit a person’s reputation. On 6 March 2026, the Court of Appeal in Bloggers Association of Kenya v Attorney General declared both sections unconstitutional, holding they were impermissibly vague and infringed the freedom of expression and media guaranteed under Articles 33 and 34 of the Constitution. Neither section can now support a prosecution or a civil claim premised on those offences. The ruling left the rest of the Act intact, so an online publisher’s real exposure under this statute now sits in other provisions, such as cyber harassment, identity theft, or child pornography offences, rather than in the former ‘false publication’ offences, and it is worth confirming this position has not shifted again on appeal before relying on it in any specific matter.

Must-Carry Obligations

Subscription television platforms are subject to must-carry obligations requiring them to carry Kenya Broadcasting Corporation channels and other specified public interest channels as part of their package, a rule aimed at ensuring public service broadcasting remains accessible on pay-TV platforms rather than being displaced entirely by commercial content. A pay-TV operator structuring its channel lineup needs to build this obligation into its carriage agreements from the start rather than treating it as a negotiable extra once commercial channel deals are in place, since a lineup that omits a must-carry channel is a compliance failure regardless of how the commercial negotiations with other broadcasters went.

Clay & Associates Advocates advises broadcasters, publishers, and digital platforms on CA licensing applications, Media Council accreditation matters, and compliance exposure under the Computer Misuse and Cybercrimes Act. If you are applying for a broadcasting licence, launching a digital publication, or need to understand which of Kenya’s three media regulators actually governs your business, we can help you map that before a licence application or a content dispute forces the question.

Operating in the media sector or applying for a broadcasting licence? Contact Clay & Associates Advocates. Book a Consultation

For tailored legal advice on this matter, speak with our communications and media legal services team at Clay & Associates Advocates. We advise businesses and individuals across Kenya on Communications and Media matters from our offices at Nextgen Mall, Nairobi. | Broadcasting Licences in Kenya