A Kenyan athlete today is likely to earn from several different sources at once: a sponsorship or endorsement deal with a brand, an appearance fee for competing at a meet or tournament, and prize money for placing well. Each of these is taxed differently under the Income Tax Act, Cap 470, and the treatment changes further depending on whether the athlete is resident in Kenya or a foreign competitor visiting for an event. Getting the classification wrong exposes the person paying the athlete, whether a sponsor, a federation or an event organiser, to a withholding tax shortfall, and exposes the athlete to an unexpected assessment later. This is purely a tax-compliance question; it is separate from the immigration and work permit rules that apply to a foreign athlete’s presence in Kenya.
How the Income Tax Act classifies an athlete’s commercial income
The Income Tax Act charges tax on income that has accrued in or is derived from Kenya. A significant share of an athlete’s commercial income falls within a specific defined category: section 2 of the Act defines a “management or professional fee” broadly, as any payment made to a person, other than a payment made to an employee by their employer, as consideration for any managerial, technical, agency, contractual, professional or consultancy services, however calculated. That definition is wide enough to potentially capture sponsorship, endorsement and appearance payments made to an athlete for providing contractual or promotional services, depending on how the arrangement is structured, alongside more conventional professional fees. Section 10 goes further for cross-border situations: where a resident person, or a person with a permanent establishment in Kenya, makes a payment to another person for a management or professional fee or training fee, a royalty, or certain other categories, including winnings from betting and gaming, that payment is deemed to be income accrued in or derived from Kenya. This is the provision that pulls a Kenyan sponsor, federation or event organiser into the Kenyan tax net when it pays a fee to an athlete, resident or not.
Withholding tax on sponsorship and appearance payments
Section 35 of the Act requires the person making a qualifying payment to deduct withholding tax at source rather than pay the recipient the full gross amount. Under KRA’s current published withholding tax guidance, a management, professional or training fee attracts withholding tax at 5% where paid to a Kenyan-resident payee and 20% where paid to a non-resident payee; KRA’s rate schedule also lists a distinct “appearance or performance fee” category, which attracts 20% withholding tax where paid to a non-resident, with no separate rate listed for a resident, meaning such payments to Kenyan-resident athletes are ordinarily assessed under the general management or professional fee category or as part of the athlete’s normal income tax filings. The withholder must remit deducted tax to KRA within five working days of payment. For a resident athlete, withholding tax deducted under these categories is generally an advance tax: the athlete must still declare the gross sponsorship or appearance income in an annual return and claims the tax already withheld as a credit against the final liability. For a non-resident athlete with no permanent establishment in Kenya, the tax withheld on a Kenya-sourced fee is generally treated as a final tax, so no further Kenyan filing is typically required.
Prize money and winnings: a different category
Prize money awarded for placing in a sporting competition, such as a marathon or a tournament, is not automatically the same thing as “winnings from betting and gaming” as that term is used and specifically taxed under Kenyan law, and the two should not be conflated. Winnings from betting and gaming is a defined category tied to wagering activity and carries its own, separately prescribed withholding treatment. Ordinary competition prize money paid to an athlete for their sporting performance is generally simply part of that athlete’s income from their trade or employment as a sportsperson, taxed under the ordinary charge to income tax rather than under the winnings category, though the correct classification can be fact-specific, particularly where a competition has an entry-fee or pooled-stake structure that starts to resemble a wager. Athletes, promoters and federations structuring prize funds should get specific advice rather than assume either category applies by default. For the taxation of a spectator’s or punter’s betting winnings, as distinct from a competitor’s prize money, see our separate guide on sports betting and gambling law.
Non-resident athletes, permanent establishment and treaty relief
Where a foreign athlete, or their management company, structures Kenyan appearances as an ongoing business carried on partly in Kenya rather than a single one-off payment, section 18 of the Act, dealing with the ascertainment of gains or profits of a business carried on partly in Kenya by a non-resident person, can become relevant alongside the withholding tax rules. Kenya also has double taxation agreements with a number of countries, which can reduce or restructure the withholding tax otherwise due on a cross-border payment; a foreign athlete’s agent or sponsor should check whether a relevant treaty applies before assuming the standard non-resident rate is final. This tax analysis is entirely separate from immigration status: a foreign athlete can hold a fully compliant work permit and still owe Kenyan withholding tax on a Kenya-sourced appearance fee, and a short competition visit exempt from work permit rules can still trigger that same withholding obligation.
Practical compliance points
Sponsors, federations and event organisers making payments to athletes should register and operate correctly as withholding tax agents, correctly classify each payment (professional fee, appearance fee, royalty or ordinary business income) before applying a rate, remit within the statutory window, and issue withholding tax certificates to the athlete. Athletes should keep full records of payments received and tax withheld against each, declare gross income annually unless a final-tax rule applies, and consider whether receiving income through a registered company changes the applicable rate. A foreign athlete’s tax treatment, including any treaty relief, should be settled before the event, not after payment.
How We Can Help
Clay & Associates Advocates advises athletes, clubs, sponsors, federations and event organisers on the tax treatment of sponsorship, endorsement, appearance and prize income, and on structuring cross-border payments to foreign athletes correctly from the outset. Our guide to work permits for foreign athletes and coaches covers the related immigration status question, and our note on sports contracts in Kenya covers drafting the underlying sponsorship and appearance agreements. Contact our Sports practice to review how a sponsorship, endorsement or appearance arrangement should be taxed before you sign it.
Sources: Income Tax Act, Cap 470, sections 2, 10, 18 and 35; Kenya Revenue Authority, withholding tax guidance.
Frequently asked questions
Does a Kenyan athlete pay tax on a sponsorship deal?
Yes. Sponsorship and endorsement income is generally taxable income, and where it falls within a withholding tax category such as a management or professional fee, tax is deducted at source as an advance payment credited against the athlete’s final annual tax liability.
What withholding tax rate applies to a foreign athlete’s appearance fee in Kenya?
Per KRA’s current published rate schedule, an appearance or performance fee paid to a non-resident attracts 20% withholding tax, generally treated as a final tax where the non-resident has no permanent establishment in Kenya, subject to any applicable double taxation treaty.
Is prize money from winning a race treated the same as betting winnings for tax purposes?
No. Winnings from betting and gaming are a specifically defined category with their own withholding treatment; ordinary competition prize money is generally taxed simply as part of the athlete’s income from their sport, though the classification can depend on how a particular competition or prize pool is structured.
Who is responsible for withholding and remitting the tax, the athlete or the payer?
The payer, whether a sponsor, federation or event organiser, is responsible for deducting withholding tax at the applicable rate and remitting it to KRA within the statutory window, and for issuing a withholding tax certificate to the athlete.



