Most Kenyan employers know they must remit National Social Security Fund and Social Health Insurance Fund contributions. Far fewer can say, with confidence, what the Work Injury Benefits Act, 2007 (WIBA) actually requires of them. WIBA is not a payroll deduction. It is a compensation and reporting regime that attaches the moment an employee is injured, falls ill, or dies as a result of work, with its own insurance obligation, its own reporting deadlines, and its own compensation mechanics. Employers who treat it as an afterthought to their NSSF and SHIF filings tend to discover the gap only after an accident, when it is too late to close it cheaply.
The Mandatory Insurance Requirement
Section 7(1) of WIBA requires every employer to obtain and maintain an insurance policy, with an insurer approved by the Cabinet Secretary, covering any liability the employer may incur under the Act to its employees. This is not satisfied by a general liability or group personal accident policy bought for other purposes. The policy must specifically cover WIBA liability, and it must stay current for as long as the employer has staff on its books, including casual and contract workers who fall within the Act’s definition of employee.
The consequence for failing to insure is deliberately blunt. Section 7(4) makes non-compliance an offence attracting a fine of up to one hundred thousand shillings, imprisonment for up to three months, or both. Section 7(5) adds a continuing penalty of up to ten thousand shillings for each day the contravention continues after conviction, so an uninsured employer does not simply pay a fine and move on. Beyond the criminal exposure, the underlying duty to compensate an injured employee under WIBA does not depend on whether the employer bothered to insure against it. Insurance funds that liability, it is not the source of it. An employer who skips the policy remains on the hook to pay the compensation itself, out of its own funds, in addition to facing prosecution. A single serious injury at an uninsured workplace can therefore produce a compensation bill, a criminal charge, and reputational damage all at once.
Reporting a Workplace Accident to the Director
WIBA also imposes reporting duties that are easy to miss because they run on short clocks. Under section 21, an employee, or someone acting on their behalf, must give notice of a workplace accident to the employer, and in the case of a fatal accident a copy of that notice must reach the Director, meaning the Director of Occupational Safety and Health Services, within twenty four hours of the accident.
Section 22 then places a separate, direct obligation on the employer: once the employer has received notice of an accident, or has otherwise learned that an employee has been injured in the course of employment, the employer must report that accident to the Director in the prescribed manner within seven days. This clock runs regardless of whether the injury looks serious at first, and an employer that waits to see how an employee’s condition develops before reporting risks missing the window entirely. The safer practice is to treat any workplace accident, however minor it initially appears, as reportable, and to build the DOSHS report into the same internal process that triggers the insurer notification.
How Compensation Is Worked Out
WIBA does not leave compensation to negotiation or to a court’s general sense of what is fair. It uses a fixed formula built around the employee’s earnings and a schedule of injuries. Under section 30, compensation for permanent disablement is calculated on the basis of ninety six months of the employee’s earnings, subject to minimum and maximum amounts set by the Cabinet Secretary, multiplied by the degree of incapacity the injury represents. Where the injury is one listed in the Act’s First Schedule, the employee is deemed to be permanently disabled to the percentage set out against that injury, so the calculation becomes largely mechanical once the medical assessment is in. Section 37 defines earnings broadly for this purpose: the employee’s monthly rate of remuneration at the time of the accident, together with specified allowances and benefits, such as housing or rations, that formed part of regular pay.
For employers, compensation exposure under WIBA scales with what the employee actually earned, not a flat statutory sum, and it depends heavily on the medical assessment of incapacity. Disputes we see most often arise from disagreement over the degree of incapacity assigned, or from earnings figures that understate allowances the employee was regularly paid. Clean payroll records showing exactly what an employee earned, including non-salary benefits, reduce the scope for dispute later.
WIBA and OSHA Are Not the Same Regime
A confusion we encounter regularly, including among HR managers who consider themselves compliant, is treating WIBA and the Occupational Safety and Health Act, 2007 (OSHA) as the same obligation. They are not. OSHA governs the preventive side of workplace safety: it sets safety standards for premises, machinery, and work processes, and it gives the Directorate of Occupational Safety and Health Services (DOSHS) the mandate to inspect workplaces, register them, and enforce those standards before anything goes wrong. WIBA governs what happens after an employee is actually injured or falls ill because of work: the duty to insure against that liability, the duty to report the incident, and the mechanism for calculating compensation.
The two regimes intersect at the Director. WIBA’s own definition provision identifies “the Director” as the Director of Occupational Safety and Health Services, the same office DOSHS operates under OSHA, which is why the accident report filed under WIBA section 22 lands with the same directorate that runs OSHA safety inspections. But complying with OSHA, safe premises, trained fire marshals, registered workplaces, does nothing to satisfy the separate WIBA duties to insure and report. An employer can pass every OSHA inspection and still breach WIBA by having no compensation insurance or by missing the reporting window, and the reverse is equally true.
How We Can Help
Clay & Associates Advocates advises employers on the employment and regulatory compliance obligations that arise once staff are on the payroll, including WIBA insurance review, accident reporting protocols, and representation where a compensation claim or DOSHS enforcement matter has already arisen. We audit whether an existing policy actually responds to WIBA liability rather than general accident cover that leaves gaps, and we help employers build internal reporting procedures that meet the seven day and twenty four hour deadlines without relying on one manager remembering to act. Where an injury has already occurred, we advise on the employer’s exposure, the compensation calculation, and any parallel OSHA investigation.
Sources: The Work Injury Benefits Act, 2007 (Ministry of Labour), Work Injury Benefits Act, 2007 (Kenya Law revised edition), Occupational Safety and Health Act, 2007 (Kenya Law revised edition), and Directorate of Occupational Safety and Health Services, Ministry of Labour.
Frequently asked questions
Does WIBA insurance replace NSSF or SHIF obligations? No. NSSF and SHIF are separate statutory schemes funded by contributions from employer and employee. WIBA insurance is a distinct policy an employer alone must buy to cover its liability to compensate employees for work related injury, illness, or death.
Who counts as an employee for WIBA purposes? Coverage extends beyond permanent staff on formal contracts to casual workers and others engaged in the employer’s business, so employers relying heavily on casual labour should confirm their policy and reporting procedures actually extend to that workforce.
What happens if we report an accident late? Late reporting under section 22 does not itself extinguish the employee’s right to compensation, but it exposes the employer to separate enforcement action and can complicate the investigation and medical assessment the compensation calculation depends on.
Is a WIBA claim the only remedy an injured employee has? WIBA is generally the primary route for work related injury compensation and is designed to operate without the employee having to prove fault. Whether other claims remain open depends on the facts, so employers facing a claim beyond WIBA’s compensation framework should take advice before responding.



